-
Sector
-
Country
Region
-
Year Published
In addition to showcasing the wide range of activities achieved during fiscal year 2020, this Annual Report sheds light on some of the many ways GPRBA continues to employ innovative results-based financing instruments to strengthen service delivery, incentivize long-term and sustainable change, reach the most vulnerable, and respond to current and future global crises (including the COVID-19 pandemic and its ancillary effects).
-
Sector
-
Country
Region
-
Year Published
The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a global humanitarian crisis, putting both lives and livelihoods at risk. In the initial stages of the pandemic – especially in contexts where the state machinery was caught unawares or lacked capacity, or both, social enterprises (SEs) or socially-driven private enterprises – have been particularly active and have stepped up to provide relief. These enterprises will continue to be important as the pandemic stretches out, with recovery likely to be a long-drawn process.
-
Sector
-
Country
Region
-
Year Published
This is the first annual report published by GPRBA under its new identity, and presents the activities of fiscal year 2019.
There is renewed emphasis in "leaving no one behind" as GPRBA has expanded its toolbox of financing instruments to reach the underserved and vulnerable populations through impact bonds and blended finance, among other results-based approaches beyond output-based aid.
-
Sector
-
Country
Region
-
Year Published
This report offers innovative ideas for cities and development partners to use their limited public funds and direct policy decisions to leverage private sector investments. The analysis shows how selected results-based instruments can help overcome investment barriers and make low-carbon and resilient infrastructure a bankable asset class for local and international investors.
-
Sector
-
Country
Region
-
Year Published
FY24 marks another transformative year for GPRBA. One of the significant achievements was the approval of a $4.2 million results-based financing (RBF) grant to support the Papua New Guinea National Energy Access Transformation Project (NEAT). This report provides an overview of our key achievements and strategic progress, underscoring our commitment to supporting the World Bank’s goals to end extreme poverty and boost shared prosperity on a livable planet.
-
Sector
-
Country
Region
-
Year Published
FY23 was an important year for GPRBA, underscored by two significant achievements. First, a $6.6 million GPRBA grant package was approved for the Yemen Integrated Urban Services Emergency Project II (YIUSEP II). Second, GPRBA held the RBF Forum in May 2023 in Nairobi, Kenya, the first in person GPRBA learning event since May 2019. Please read the full report to learn more about the achievements of fiscal year 2023.
|
|
GPRBA's flagship knowledge event, RBF Forum 2023, was held in Nairobi, Kenya from May 22-25, 2023.
The forum served as a platform for showcasing impactful projects, unveiling evidence of results-based financing (RBF) approaches in development, fostering knowledge exchange among RBF practitioners, and thought leaders, and facilitating invaluable networking opportunities.
Opening the forum on day one was "Showcase Day," which offered a series of presentations and engaging panel discussions. Notably, participants gained insights into the global landscape of RBF through thought-provoking discussions among diverse organizations and partners. These discussions delved into how RBF can effectively address development challenges and the future opportunities for this financing modality.
Day Two witnessed the forum's focus shift towards in-depth discussions and immersive workshops. Participants had the benefit of learning directly from field experts, sharing their own experiences and challenges, and establishing connections with fellow practitioners. Key themes explored included forced displacement, gender, climate change and innovative RBF instruments like impact bonds.
On Day Three, attendees embarked on a field visit to Kayole Soweto, an informal settlement in Nairobi that has benefited significant cross-sectoral infrastructure investments through GPRBA and the World Bank over the past decade. Touring the settlement, participants witnessed firsthand the impact of the investments and discussions with residents and implementing partners offered invaluable insights and considerations for future projects.
On the concluding day, a wrap-up session was conducted to distill the key insights garnered during the forum and foster constructive discussions on the path ahead. This comprehensive session served as a platform for participants to reflect collectively on the wealth of knowledge and experiences shared throughout the event.
Forum Highlights
Building a Path to Results: Three Vital Elements of Successful Outcome-Based Approaches
|
By Mara Airoldi, Academic Director at the Government Outcomes Lab (GO Lab)
The idea of Outcome-Based approaches, including Results-Based Finance (RBF), is pleasantly straightforward: let’s link payments to the achievement of specific results or outcomes, rather than the inputs or activities. Yet the implementation of these approaches is marred with challenges. For instance, it is often difficult to define result metrics and performance indicators, to manage payment mechanism or to ensure long term sustainability.
Over the past twenty years, I have worked with organisations interested in using their resources to achieve outcomes. So, what are my top three recommendations on how to foster the benefits of these approaches?
- Start from the problem you want to solve and think long term
It might sound clichéd, but it is always a good idea to start from the problem you want to solve and the long-term plan on how to solve it. This means thinking bigger and beyond the duration of the program being funded. We need to ask ourselves what sort of impact we want to achieve, and the difference we want to make in 5-10 years.
Ultimately, we must consider what the underpinning ‘theory of change’ of the program is. Or in short, what makes us think that the program will lead to different results. The articulation of the theory of change should include both a good understanding of the intervention being funded (e.g., giving access to clean water or to early childhood education), as well as the rationale for using an outcome-based approach instead of a traditional grant or loan (e.g., building competencies, sharing risks). A revealing question to help in identifying the rationale for using an outcome-based approach is to consider what should happen at the end of the program.
- Cultivate a learning culture, share data and insights.
Even when there is strong evidence that an intervention is effective, ‘how’ to make it work in a particular time and in a specific geography is part science and part art, requiring continuous learning, ingenuity, and adaptability.
Outcome-based approaches and RBFs are, by definition, a data rich environment as they require the measurement of results and usually a good monitoring and evaluation process in place throughout the program. Yet there is so much more those data could tell us, if only we gathered them systematically, using shared concepts and definitions, and compared them across time and geographies.
GO Lab promoted the launch of a global data collaboration called INDIGO, which stands for “International Network for Data on Impact and Government Outcomes”. This collaboration brings together data stewards, researchers, and Outcomes based approach practitioners who wish to share their data, insights, and learning.
It is an open data platform which currently maintains several datasets and community events to generate insights. While the main dataset is dedicated to impact bonds, a particular outcome-based instrument, the INDIGO community is exploring ways to include all outcomes-based approaches. For instance, a prototype dataset for outcome-based approaches in the pipeline has been launched, as well as a machine-learning assisted database of searchable empirical evidence on these instruments (SyROCCo).
- Support Governments and local communities in building the competencies to define results, monitor delivery, and learn
Governments should be engaged early in the design of an RBF because they are the key actors and, in several outcomes-based approaches, responsible for paying for outcomes, if achieved.
Therefore, it would make sense that they have a strong voice in defining the desired outcomes, assessing whether progress towards achieving those outcomes is taking place, and how much resources is worth spending.
In 2022, with the support of Social Finance, we published a framework to describe the competencies needed in an ecosystem, including governments, to engage in outcome-based approaches. The framework has been at times seen as an assessment tool. Often readers immediately approached it with a “compliance” hat, as a checklist. I think this is a mistake. The framework is instead a useful guidance of the competencies partners in an outcome-based partnership can expect to develop over time. With this “pedagogical” hat, the framework becomes a tool to be intentional on a learning journey, to ask questions and guide reflection. It could hence be an inspiring tool, instead of an alienating one.
Outcome-based approaches and RBF are usually deployed where simpler mechanisms are failing to deliver results and where a change of behaviour of individuals, organisations of entire systems is needed. It should not surprise us that they may be more challenging. Yet, they can create the space for learning on how to deliver results in these challenging contexts. Like all learning journeys, intentionality and reflection are needed. Like all learning journeys, it helps to compare notes and build on the experiences of fellow travellers.
|
If it’s not a bond, then what it is? Join us for a candid discussion about impact bonds, a unique form of results-based financing (RBF) that brings together public and private sector finance and expertise to achieve development outcomes. Under an impact bond model, private investors finance an intervention and are repaid by either the government or a donor upon the achievement of pre-defined outcomes. Impact bonds are often used when working with non-state providers with liquidity constraints and can be leveraged by governments who wish to fund innovation with reduced risk.